Amare spekuliert, dass Tony Parker und Melo ihn nach NYC begleiten könnten.
http://www.realgm.com/src_wiretap_a...ims_carmelo_parker_will_join_him_with_knicks/
Aber selbst ein solches Team würde doch nichts gewinnen Schön anzusehen wäre es aber wohl allemal :laugh2:
But is any of this realistic?
Let's presume the Knicks succeed in their quest this summer to land two premier free agents, starting at $16.6 million each. In that case, they will have a little under $2 million in remaining cap room to add one more player. Once that money is spent they will have eight players in the fold and will, by league rule, have to give minimum-salary contracts to at least five additional players. If the goal is to gain cap space in 2011, then everybody except the two stars will get a one-year contract (or two years with a team option after one).
From there, the Knicks have to make decisions on Danilo Gallinari ($4.19 million) and Toney Douglas ($1.15 million), whose team options for 2011 need to be picked up by this October 31.
Then next summer, Curry's $11.3 million salary vanishes from the payroll, along with all the one-year contracts. At that point the Knicks will face decisions on Bill Walker, whose $916,000 salary for 2011-12 is not guaranteed, and Wilson Chandler, who will become a restricted free agent -- the Knicks need to figure out whether to retain his rights. And they will have a first-round draft pick on the books -- the lesser of their own pick and Houston's pick as a result of the Jared Jeffries trade.
Let's suppose the Knicks keep Gallinari but sacrifice everyone else -- including the draft pick -- for the sake of 2011 cap room. If so, their roster will consist of just Gallinari and the two max players signed in 2010. After accounting for raises and incomplete roster holds, their team salary will add up to $44.39 million. So would that leave enough cap space for Carmelo?
Unfortunately, the answer appears to be no. If the cap stays unchanged from this summer's projected $56.1 million, only $11.7 million would be left over for the free-agent chase. That's not enough to lure a player like Anthony.
Das kann man pauschal nicht sagen, da würde es einfach auch auf die anderen Bausteine drauf ankommen.
Parker
Chandler
Melo
Gallo
Amare
Run'and'Gun vom feinsten und null defense. Mir würde es reichen.
Amaré hat keine Lust "out of position" zu spielen. Er ist ein PF. Chandler ist auch nicht gerade ein SG vor dem Herrn. Ist Gallinari ein PF? In dieser S5 würden also 2-3 Spieler nicht auf ihrer idealen Position spielen, damit wäre ihr Spiel auch weit vom Ideal entfernt
Unter D'Antoni gibt es eh kaum einen Unterschied zwischen der PF und Centerposition. Auch bei den Suns ist Amare oft als Center aufgelaufen... sehe da kein Problem.
Fuffie schrieb:Amare auf C? Man hat doch Curry in NY, dazu im contract year...das riecht doch förmlich nach Trennkost und 20/10 in der nächsten Saison?!
By now, it's obvious that any help won't do. Wade doesn't want Amare Stoudemire, whom the Heat nearly grabbed at the February trade deadline according to a source, or Carlos Boozer, who would love to play in Miami.
He doesn't want Brendan Haywood or David Lee as primary help. He could have had any of those players lining up beside him by now. Dirk Nowitzki's size and game would be a perfect complement to Wade, except Nowitzki is 32 and seemingly married to Dallas.
Wade's decision hinges on Chris Bosh or LeBron James coming to the Heat. At the very least, it hinges on them not lining up together in Cleveland or Chicago to form the kind of dynasty Riley talked about here. And Wade wants to join.
Vielleicht eher 10 Rebounds für seinen Gegenspieler, weil Curry nicht ausblockt Man mag es sich ja kaum vorstellen, aber vielleicht hängt sich Curry ja nochmal rein, wenn ein oder zwei dicke Fische in NY unterschreiben.10 Rebounds von Curry?
amare würde übrigens sehr gut nach chicago passen, finde ich.
er muss nicht center spielen, hat einen der die drecksarbeit macht (ziemlich gut sogar), nen guten pointguard an der seite.