Suchergebnisse

Results without Wind Factor : 1. Jacobsen 450.5 (1.) 2. Evensen 444.9 (3.) 3. Kranjec 440.6 (2.) 4. Ammann 434.1 (4.) 5. Koch 428.7 (5.) 6. Malysz 425.2 (6.)

So lets allow Karlsruher SC to play with 13 players against Bayern, but when they score goal it would be valued as 0.75. That would be great, wouldn't it, Bayern winning with a result 2.0:1.5! :D:

Then you are a very old groupie :D:

Anyone who can enjoy these kind of competitions is not a sport fan, he is a ski-jumping groupie :D: Ski-jumping as a sporting discipline is dead, this has nothing to do with a sport anymore.

Uhrmann - 186.5m - 9th Ulmer - 190.0m - 33th Yes, these rules made it really interesting :D: Evensen - 3rd longest jump(210.0m) - 17th place! Walter Hofer needs a therapy....quickly...

http://www.laola1.at/489+M5fb47601669.html Pointner :up:

So, if a jumper goes too far under old rules, than it is too dangerous. But if it goes too far under new rules - it is only the 'risk of ski jumping'. That's the biggest bullshit I've ever heard :D:

If Kranjec jumped 226m and fell under Old Rules, there would be 2 pages of comments here :D:

Hehehe...after all, in Sochi 2014, he would be younger than Okabe is now :) It is a shame he couldn't advance to 'A' team this season, his summer results were more than promising...

And Funaki? Will he finish his career now he wasn't selected for Vancouver?

I respect your opinion, but I strongly disagree with it. I follow various sports because I find them interesting and exciting, and not because I'm obsessed with some athlete or a team. Of course, I have my favorites, but the rules of the game are always the main reason why a follow a certain...

But it shows that this is not the first time something like this was proposed, but even then the main problem was the same. You don't understand, I'm talking about the new system and not about the jumpers. It treats every jumper the same with no respect to their individuality, because it is...

What I tried to say, that majority of those who watch ski-jumping anyway will fit into category 'general public'. Read this interesting interview with mr. Innauer from the beggining of the season : http://www.wzonline.at/DesktopDefault.aspx?TabID=3845&Alias=sport&cob=450231&Page12935=7 *...

Says who? Those gate formulas? So every jumper will gain / lose EXACTLY the same with a 1m higher/shorter inrun? If you really believe this, then you are very naive. These new rules will never be accepted by general public. When Ammann jumped 5.5 meters more than Loitzl in Garmisch, but still...

It is bizzare to have a competition where a jumper could land 35m shorter and still be in front. Then it is no more a sport, it is a circus show. Of course that with higher speed you will be able to jump longer, but it is not that simple. These new rules are actually saying that Kofler and...

And for everyone who thinks that ski-jumping can be described with just those 2 formulas : If we don't count style-marks (so we can include pre-qualified jumpers), the standings would look like this : Ammann - 178.3 Malysz - 170.9 Kofler - 162.8 Loitzl - 161.9 Romoeren - 160.8 Jacobsen - 160.1...

Blah-blah-blah...we must create perfect environment for all athletes, there should be no stress...absolutely same conditions for everyone...otherwise they could start crying :D: Do you really think ski-jumpers are such pussies? :D: You say these formulas will make competition fair?? Guess...

And lets assume this was competition round instead of Qualifying. First 2 jumpers from the qualifying were : 1. Evensen - 224.5m (gate 32) - 207.6 pts 1. Jacobsen - 218.0m (gate 30) - 207.6 pts Ammann started from gate 19, jumped 204.0m and lets say he got 5x19.0 stylemarks. So, he would end...

:up::up:

And then again, there are always same jumpers at the top of the standings even in ski-flying competitions. I agree :)