bender
Bankspieler
LeBron James can't win, even after winHatte auch irgendwo einen Artikelausschnitt gelesen, wo stand, dass LeBron nur verlieren kann.
Macht er 30 Punkte, ist er ein Ego, macht er 8 und verteilt lieber den Ball, weil er keinen Touch hat, isser ne Pfeiffe.
Nebenbei bemerkt ist das schon ein Eye-Opener, dass die Nowitzki-Bird Vergleiche nicht annähernd solche Reaktionen hervorrufen wie die James-Jordan Vergleiche. Ersteres kann man nüchtern diskutieren, aber bei letzteren geht das irgendwie nicht.ESPN schrieb:As a result, LeBron's team won. If the Heat didn't win, LeBron would have received the blame, not his supporting cast. We're making Larry Bird comparisons for Nowitzki even though he's ringless, yet are withholding judgment on LeBron until we see how many he wins. There's an even greater status Dirk has achieved: He's allowed to miss. He became sanctified after making that 3-pointer and lefty layup late in Game 2. That's what happens when you have the made shots in the Finals on your résumé.
When Michael Jordan repeatedly passed to John Paxson in the final quarter of the 1991 NBA Finals, it was viewed as a breakthrough, the superstar yielding to the system for the sake of the team. LeBron does it and its treated as an act of cowardice.
With the score tied in the final minute, James had the vision and the skills to fire the ball sideways past a double-team to an open Chris Bosh. James has always shown a willingness to go back to his teammates no matter how poorly they're playing. With the game on the line, he went to a guy who was 6-for-17 at the time, with a scratched eye that left him squinting like The Boondocks' Uncle Ruckus.