MK23 - skiimport
Nachwuchsspieler
- Beiträge
- 347
- Punkte
- 0
Reading some of the comments here, I must notice that some of you would prefer 'new rules' even if we were jumping in indoor arenas, etc. perfect conditions.
The bottom line is that new rules are unnecessary in 80% of competitions, otherwise we would had many more cancellations during past seasons, and we would had 15 different winners per season (when in fact last season top4 from overall world cup won 25/27 competitions, and this season they won 20/23 events.) How do you explain only 2 cancellations in Holmenkollen in last 70 years?
And in those competitions where they could be somewhat useful, they would only create more confusion, just like it has been shown in Lahti(team) or Oslo. So far under the new rules we had :
- jumper outjumping the hill (Kranjec, Oberstdorf skifliegen)
- one round lasting 100 minutes (Lahti, team competition)
- huge wind lottery, possibly even unfairer than with old rules (Holmenkollen)
There is just no way that Ammann could outjump Malysz by 7.5m, judging on training results, if Malysz really had so much better conditions. Try reading his interview, and notice how all trainers were astonished when they saw wind deduction of 17.0 points for Malysz's jump!
http://skijumping.pl/wiadomosci/11709/Adam-Malysz-Bylem-wkurzony/
You mention nordic combined competition during OWG, but when you have 1 round competition, something like that could always happen. All major wind lotteries from the past were decided after just one round (Liberec 09 WCH, Pragelato 09, Garmisch 07, Zakopane 07, Kuusamo 07). FIS should have concentrated on that - maybe to make trial round a spare competition round, to use qualification round as a spare round, or to have possibility to cancel the results even though complete round has been completed - if it is obvious that results were hugely influenced by weather conditions. And believe me, weather has even more influence on alpine skiing - especially speed disciplines (1 round races).
Et ceterum censeo New Rules esse delendam :
The bottom line is that new rules are unnecessary in 80% of competitions, otherwise we would had many more cancellations during past seasons, and we would had 15 different winners per season (when in fact last season top4 from overall world cup won 25/27 competitions, and this season they won 20/23 events.) How do you explain only 2 cancellations in Holmenkollen in last 70 years?
And in those competitions where they could be somewhat useful, they would only create more confusion, just like it has been shown in Lahti(team) or Oslo. So far under the new rules we had :
- jumper outjumping the hill (Kranjec, Oberstdorf skifliegen)
- one round lasting 100 minutes (Lahti, team competition)
- huge wind lottery, possibly even unfairer than with old rules (Holmenkollen)
There is just no way that Ammann could outjump Malysz by 7.5m, judging on training results, if Malysz really had so much better conditions. Try reading his interview, and notice how all trainers were astonished when they saw wind deduction of 17.0 points for Malysz's jump!
http://skijumping.pl/wiadomosci/11709/Adam-Malysz-Bylem-wkurzony/
You mention nordic combined competition during OWG, but when you have 1 round competition, something like that could always happen. All major wind lotteries from the past were decided after just one round (Liberec 09 WCH, Pragelato 09, Garmisch 07, Zakopane 07, Kuusamo 07). FIS should have concentrated on that - maybe to make trial round a spare competition round, to use qualification round as a spare round, or to have possibility to cancel the results even though complete round has been completed - if it is obvious that results were hugely influenced by weather conditions. And believe me, weather has even more influence on alpine skiing - especially speed disciplines (1 round races).
Et ceterum censeo New Rules esse delendam :
Zuletzt bearbeitet von einem Moderator: